House, J.S., G.A. Fine, and K.S. Cook. 1995. Reply: The Promise of Sociological Social Psychology.

House, James S., Gary A. Fine, and Karen S. Cook. 1995. “Reply: The Promise of Sociological Social Psychology.” Social Psychology Quarterly 58(4): 336-338.

Social psychology is necessary for understanding the link between social structure and social action, uniting macro structures with the agencies and experiences of the individual. However, worries about further fragmentation as sociological sub-fields become increasingly fragmented  (hearkening to the concerns of House 1977).  Is social psychology merging its two disciplines too much – ignoring critical disciplinary uniqueness, in favor of sampling from the other?

Social psychologists are more able to deal with threats to legitimacy/limitations, due to increasing social/intellectual cohesion.

Just for fun – oh, the verbage — “Post-modernism for Stryker represents a fin de siècle hopelessness, rather than an invigorating questioning of the taken-for-granted that prods the sociological imagination” (337).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: