Monthly Archives: May 2016
Kunkel, C. 1999. “A Visual Analysis of Feminist Dress.”
Kunkel, Charlotte. 1999. “A Visual Analysis of Feminist Dress.” Pp. 183-188 in The Meanings of Dress, edited by Mary Lynn Damhorst, Kimberly A. Miller, and Susan O. Michelman. New York: Fairchild Publications. How do feminists dress? Why is there a seeming cultural conflict between perceptions of who feminists are and what they look like, […]
Michelman, S.O. 1999. “Appearance for Dress and Sexuality” in MOD.
Michelman, Susan O. 1999. “Appearance for Gender and Sexuality.” Pp. 168-176 in The Meanings of Dress, edited by Mary Lynn Damhorst, Kimberly A. Miller, and Susan O. Michelman. New York: Fairchild Publications. Historical codes of masculinity and femininity offered restrictive fashion codes to men and elaborated fashion codes for women – encouraging different appearance and […]
Damhorst, M.L. 1999. “Dress in Human Interaction” in MOD.
Damhorst, Mary Lynn. 1999. “Dress in Human Interaction.” Pp. 127-139 in The Meanings of Dress, edited by Mary Lynn Damhorst, Kimberly A. Miller, and Susan O. Michelman. New York: Fairchild Publications. McCracken (1985) – because dress stays relatively fixed throughout most interactions, it may be used to communicate fixed or relatively stable characteristics of the […]
Damhorst, M.L. “Dress as Nonverbal Communication” in MOD
Damhorst, Mary Lynn. 1999. “Dress as Nonverbal Communication.” Pp. 78-89 in The Meanings of Dress, edited by Mary Lynn Damhorst, Kimberly A. Miller, and Susan O. Michelman. New York: Fairchild Publications. Dress as a backdrop for other forms of communication – facial expression, physical gesture and movement, body position, distance between people, tone of voice, […]
Miller, Kimberly A. 1999. “The Body in Context.” Pp. 12-24 in The Meanings of Dress, edited by Mary Lynn Damhorst, Kimberly A. Miller, and Susan O. Michelman. New York: Fairchild Publications. Kaiser (1997) – historical, cultural, and social contexts are important to consider when interpreting dress and associated meanings. Agonic power (“doing”) attributed to men […]
Damhorst, M.L. 1999. “Introduction” to The Meanings of Dress.
Damhorst, Mary Lynn. 1999. “Introduction.” Pp. 1-11 in The Meanings of Dress, edited by Mary Lynn Damhorst, Kimberly A. Miller, and Susan O. Michelman. New York: Fairchild Publications. “Dress is what people do to their bodies to maintain, manage, and alter their appearance; therefore, dress is behavior” (2). “Dress is more than mere objects and […]
Bernard, P., S.J. Gervais, J. Allen, A. Delmee, and O. Klein. 2015. “From Sex Objects to Human Beings: Masking Sexual Body Parts and Humanization as Moderators to Women’s Objectification.”
Bernard, Philippe, Sarah J. Gervais, Jill Allen, Alice Delmée, and Olivier Klein. 2015. “From Sex Objects to Human Beings: Masking Sexual Body Parts and Humanization as Moderators to Women’s Objectification.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 39(4): 432-446. Add-in: several forms of identified objectification beyond sexual objectification: 1) instrumentality – separating function from person (Gruenfeld et al […]
Weiner, R.L., S.J. Gervais, J. Allen, and A. Marquez. 2013. “Eye of the Beholder: Effects of Perspective and Sexual Objectification on Harassment Judgments.”
Weiner, Richard L., Sarah J. Gervais, Jill Allen, and Allissa Marquez. 2013. “Eye of the Beholder: Effects of Perspective and Sexual Objectification on Harassment Judgments.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 19 (2): 206-221. Sexual objectification (within simulated work interview situations) resulted in poorer performance and greater negative emotional experiences of those objectified. Sexual harassment within […]
Jasper, C.R. and M.E. Roach-Higgins. 1987/1995. “Dress: Views on Time and Place.”
Jasper, Cynthia R. and Mary Ellen Roach-Higgins. 1995. “Dress: Views on Time and Place.” Pp. 374-377 in Dress and Identity, edited by Mary Ellen Roach-Higgins, Joanne B. Eicher, and Kim K.P. Johnson. New York: Fairchild Publications. Originally printed as: Jasper, Cynthia R. and Mary Ellen Roach-Higgins. 1987. “Dress: Views on Time and Place.” Selection from […]
Lennon, T.L., S.J. Lennon, and K.K.P. Johnson. 1993/1995. “Is Clothing Probative of Attitude or Intent? Implications for Rape and Sexual Harassment Cases.”
Lennon, Theresa L., Sharron J. Lennon, and Kim K.P. Johnson. 1995. “Is Clothing Probative of Attitude or Intent? Implications for Rape and Sexual Harassment Cases.” Pp. 209-217 in Dress and Identity, edited by Mary Ellen Roach-Higgins, Joanne B. Eicher, and Kim K.P. Johnson. New York: Fairchild Publications. Originally printed as: Lennon, Theresa L., Sharron […]
Granola, Grad School and Goffman 
Recent Comments